Skip to content

Tortoise Shell

Free to use

More ways to engage with the public.

Surveys, maps, document comments and live sessions all run from one project page, so people take part the way that suits them, and the team reads every answer in the same workspace.

Shell is in public beta. Get beta

Existing Conditions2045 GROWTH BOUNDARY
N

The valley as it is today, with the wash corridor and the habitat blocks laid over the same drawing.

01How it works

From an idea to public results.

Six stages from an empty project to published results, each one a thing a person does inside the workspace.

02Project structure

Built from modules.

Plan review, maps, surveys, polls, comments, events, updates and results. Switch one on and it appears on the project's public page.

5 of 8 enabled · the public page carries these

04Document review

Comment on the page it concerns.

A resident reads the plan, picks the page, and leaves the comment on the drawing itself. Every note stays with that page, kept as written.

Tortoise ReviewDraft Creosote Valley 2045 Area Plan · Draft 4
Comments 2

Draft page 47 of 118 · read only

Comments on page 47

2

Marcus Reed

Biodiversity · page 50

Saddleback Road is where the wildlife movement map and the crash map overlap. That is the crossing to fix first.

Luis Ortega

Biodiversity · page 47

Keep the wash corridor open. It floods, and it is the only connected habitat left inside the planning area.

Every comment stays with the page it was made on. Originals are never replaced by a summary.

05Interactive map

Where people would put it.

Project layers with public input placed on top: points, lines and areas, a photograph where one was attached, and the density read as where people wrote rather than as a vote.

Existing Conditions2045 GROWTH BOUNDARY
N
06Surveys

Every question reported on its own.

Single choice, multiple choice, ranking, priority allocation, scale and open response. Each question totals its own answers, so nothing is buried in an average.

Community Priorities · Question 1 of 32,447 responses

Which issues should receive the most attention as Creosote Valley grows?

Multiple Choice · every question optional · no account needed

Habitat protection1,184
Trail connections1,102
Housing choices908
Safer streets896
Parks and recreation782
Open-space access694
Community services421
Growth management404

The share each answer received is drawn behind the choice. Multiple selections are allowed, so the answers do not sum to the number of responses.

07Live presentations

In the room, not only online.

A presentation the room joins on its own phones. The slide, the question, and the answer as it arrives, on every phone and on the screen at the front.

Live · slide 6 · poll

Open

Which route should the greenway take?

Tap an answer · answered on the room's phones

Illustrative · a session from the demonstration project

08The record

Everything stays on the record.

Documents keep their versions, files stay with the project, and what a person wrote is kept as they wrote it, so a decision can be read back years later.

  • Draft Creosote Valley 2045 Area PlanDraft 4In Review
  • Habitat & Wildlife Movement Assessment1.0Published
  • Existing Conditions Report1.0Published
  • Community Survey Summary, 20251.0Published
09AI support

Meet Olive, your new assistant.

She drafts the reply to a comment, pulls the research behind it, and writes the project update. A person reads everything before it sends.

Comment · Creosote Valley, page 50

“The wash floods every monsoon. If the trail runs along it, where does the water go?”

Resident, via the public review

Olive

Draft reply

“The plan keeps the wash itself as open space and sets the trail on the bench above it, so the water keeps its channel. Your note is filed under Habitat & Connectivity, alongside 684 others about the same crossing.”

Your planner reads it before it sends

10Intelligence

From public input to insight.

Every comment, map point and answer is read together, so the themes and the action that follows are drawn from the record rather than from memory.

Comments counted
2,539
Residents took part
3,184
Themes collected
5

05 · Proposed action

AI drafted · B-04

Wildlife crossing structures on Saddleback Road

High priority · 2-5 years

11Results and metrics

Results and metrics.

Participants, responses, map comments and document comments, each counted the same way every time. The same record leaves as a PDF or a spreadsheet, already laid out.

Participation record6,128 pieces of input

3,184

Participants

People who took part

2,447

Survey responses

Completed surveys

1,062

Map comments

Points, lines and areas

738

Document comments

Filed against a page

Participation is self-selected, so every figure reads as what was said and how often, never as a sample of the valley.

Software

For project builders

Run the whole engagement.

See plans

Practice

For project deliverables

Commission the plan itself.

Explore Studio

Contact

Talk to us about your project.

Tell us what you are planning and we will show you how Shell fits it.

Contact us