Skip to content
All use cases

Mobility & Field Engagement

Every comment about a corridor should arrive with its location.

A corridor study is a narrow question asked along a long line. The input only becomes usable when it is attached to the segment, intersection or driveway it is about, and separated by the mode it was given for.

01The challenge

Where corridor feedback is lost

  1. 01

    A paragraph where a place is needed

    "The crossing by the school is dangerous" is a sentence someone has to locate. The same comment placed on that crossing is a record that can be joined to the network.

  2. 02

    Four modes, one comment box

    People who walk, cycle, drive and take transit describe the same street differently. In one undifferentiated list, the differences disappear.

  3. 03

    Trade-offs described instead of chosen

    Lane widths, parking and crossings are choices between options. An open comment period collects opinions about the choice rather than a distribution across it.

02Where Tortoise helps

Four products, one record.

Each part of the platform does one job in the sequence, and the record stays in the same project throughout.

Tortoise Shell

A map activity over the study area with categories for access, safety, crossings and mobility, plus surveys that put the cross-sections and options in front of people.

Tortoise Discover

The public page for the study, carrying the map, the exhibits and the dated updates the corridor will need across its life.

Tortoise Intelligence

Groups the comments by the category and the place they carry, and drafts what the corridor record appears to say, for staff to check.

Tortoise Studio

Corridor exhibits and cross-section graphics, when the study needs to be argued visually.

03The workflow

From a published map to an analysed record

Four stages, and the coordinates survive all of them.

  1. 01

    Publish the corridor and the categories

    The study area goes up with a map activity that asks for one kind of comment at a time: a crossing, an access point, a gap in the sidewalk, a place that feels unsafe.

  2. 02

    Ask by mode and by place

    Each mark carries its category, so a walking comment and a freight comment are told apart before anyone reads them.

  3. 03

    Show the options rather than describing them

    Cross-sections and alternatives go up as survey questions, so people choose between the real options and the result is a distribution rather than a set of objections.

  4. 04

    Review by segment, export for the analysis

    Staff read comments grouped by where they landed, and the export carries the position of each mark for the GIS work.

04What it looks like

The same record, drawn.

A figure of the workflow above, labeled as an illustration rather than a screenshot.

Illustrative figureNot a screenshot
1234
  • 1Crossingwalking
  • 2Accessdriveway
  • 3Gapsidewalk ends
  • 4Stoptransit
Illustrative: comments placed along a corridor, each carrying its category.

Next

Running a corridor study?

Send the study area and we will show the map activity working on a corridor like yours.